Interest Group Lobbying and Corporate Strategy
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study corporate non-market strategies designed to influence the lobbying behavior of other special interest groups. We focus on conditions under which costly lobbying is an informative signal to policymakers about the true state of the world, and in which stringent policy is so costly to the firm that the firm is not viewed as a credible source of information. We study three corporate non-market strategies: 1) the ‘‘bearhug,’’ in which the firm subsidizes the lobbying activities of an interest group before the true state of the world is known, 2) ‘‘astroturfing,’’ in which the firm subsidizes the lobbying activities of a group with similar views after the state of the world is known, and 3) self-regulation, in which the firm voluntarily limits the potential social harm from its activities. All three of these strategies can be used to reduce the informativeness of lobbying. We identify conditions under which each strategy is profitable for the firm. All three strategies, however, reduce the welfare of the public decisionmaker.
منابع مشابه
Astroturf: Interest Group Lobbying and Corporate Strategy
We study three corporate nonmarket strategies designed to influence the lobbying behavior of other special interest groups: (1) astroturf, in which the firm covertly subsidizes a group with similar views to lobby when it normally would not; (2) the bear hug, in which the firm overtly pays a group to alter its lobbying activities; and (3) self-regulation, in which the firm voluntarily limits the...
متن کاملInterest Group Lobbying, Corporate Strategy and Environmental Policy
We study three corporate non-market strategies designed to in‡uence the lobbying behavior of other special interest groups concerning environmental and/or health and safety issues: 1) “astroturf,” in which the ...rm covertly subsidizes a group with similar views to lobby when it normally would not, 2) the “bearhug,” in which the ...rm overtly subsidizes the lobbying activities of another intere...
متن کاملLobby or Contribute? The Impact of Corporate Governance on Firms' Political Strategies
This paper theoretically and empirically studies the impact of corporate governance level on firms’ choice in two political strategies: lobbying and making political contributions. The theoretical model implies that managers with short-run personal interest, prefer making political contributions; while shareholders caring about firms’ longterm success, are willing to do informational lobbying. ...
متن کاملExploring corporate lobbyists’ perceptions of prospective coalition partners in Brussels
Using original data from a survey conducted in 2012, we apply theoretical insights from the literature on strategic alliances to explore Brussels-based corporate lobbyists’ perceptions of prospective political partners. We find these perceptions to be driven primarily by strategic considerations. We also uncover instances where the size and nationality of respondents’ firms influence their part...
متن کاملVested Interests in Addiction Research and Policy The challenge corporate lobbying poses to reducing society’s alcohol problems: insights from UK evidence on minimum unit pricing
BACKGROUND There has been insufficient research attention to alcohol industry methods of influencing public policies. With the exception of the tobacco industry, there have been few studies of the impact of corporate lobbying on public health policymaking more broadly. METHODS We summarize here findings from documentary analyses and interview studies in an integrative review of corporate effo...
متن کامل